About
On June 16, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden signed into law the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA), enacted as Public Law 117-146 [PDF, 219 KB]. This webpage catalogs Commission actions taken to comply with requirements established by the enacted legislation. It will be updated regularly.
OSRA Rulemaking Activity
Final Rule
Industry Advisories
- Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts
Posted: June 2, 2023 - Industry Advisory — Interim Procedures for Submitting “Charge Complaints” Under 46 U.S.C. § 41310
Posted: July 14, 2022 - Industry Advisory — Demurrage and Detention Billing Practices
Posted: July 22, 2022 - Industry Advisory — Applicability of Provisions Contained in PL 117-146
Posted: June 24, 2022
Charge Complaints
Reports
- Study on Best Practices of Chassis Pools (National Academies)
This report is published pursuant to section 19 of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. The report was produced by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. It is not a work product of the Federal Maritime Commission. - Fact Finding 29 Final Report
- Containerized Freight Statistics
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can I file a Charge Complaint within a Formal Proceeding under 46 CFR § 502.61 or Small Claims (formal or informal) Proceeding under 46 CFR § 502.301-321?
No. Charge Complaints are a separate process from Formal or Small Claims complaints.
Charge complaint filers can choose to separately submit a Formal or Small Claims complaint, or provide information to the Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement, Investigation, and Compliance in support of a Commission investigation, but these distinct processes cannot be combined into a single submission.
You can also seek alternative dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services.
More information on the Charge Complaint Process can be found in Guidance on Charge Complaint Interim Procedures.
If a demurrage and detention invoice/bill does not meet OSRA’s requirements, does that permanently eliminate responsibility to pay the charges on that non-conforming invoice?
No. Issuing an invoice/bill that does not comply with OSRA’s requirements does not permanently eliminate the invoice recipient’s (invoiced/billed party’s) obligation to pay those charges.
46 U.S.C. § 41104(f) cancels the obligation to pay an invoice/bill that does not conform to OSRA but does not prevent the carrier from reissuing the charges on an invoice/bill that does meet OSRA requirements. A charged party does have an obligation to pay charges billed via a compliant invoice.
Does OSRA have a phase-in period? Can the public wait for further Commission guidance or rulemakings before complying?
No. OSRA included no phase-in periods, with a few limited exceptions. OSRA requirements became effective when enacted on June 16, 2022. The Commission addressed this question in Industry Advisories posted here on June 24, 2022 and July 22, 2022 (See Industry Advisories Section above).
The Commission is engaged in several rulemakings necessary to implement OSRA. Pending or future rulemakings do not defer the obligation to comply with OSRA requirements that are already in effect.
Is the Commission planning to issue rulemakings regarding OSRA? Where can I look for guidance?
Rulemakings are underway to implement OSRA. Detailed instructions on how to submit comments, including instructions on how to request confidential treatment, who to contact for further information, and any additional information on the rulemaking process is described in the respective rulemaking documents when they are issued.
The Commission has transitioned to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at regulations.gov to provide a central location for public notice and opportunity for comment on its rulemaking proceedings.
Information on current rulemaking projects is posted on this page or can be viewed on the Commission’s reginfo.gov page.
Do invoices/bills issued to non-U.S. entities need to comply with OSRA’s invoice/billing requirements? What if they are issued by a non-U.S. entity?
Yes. The requirements are applicable to common carriers as defined at 46 U.S.C. § 40102(7). The Commission does not determine if a common carrier meets that definition based on if its customers are based in the U.S. Instead, the Commission makes its determination based on whether a common carrier holds itself out to provide transportation between the U.S. and a foreign country and uses, for all or part of the transportation, a vessel operating between a U.S. port and a foreign port.
If an entity is acting as a common carrier as defined under the Shipping Act, then the common carrier’s invoices/bills for charges to both U.S. and non-U.S. entities are subject to the law. The common carrier must also comply with the invoice/billing requirements of 46 U.S.C. § 41104(d) for demurrage and detention charges. This holds true regardless of whether the invoices/bills are issued in the United States or abroad, whether they are issued to a U.S. entity or a foreign entity, and whether they are issued by a U.S. common carrier or non-U.S. common carrier.
Where can I learn more about the rulemaking process?
An abbreviated explanation of the rulemaking process can be found on Regulations.gov. A more expansive reference, that includes Frequently Asked Questions and a “Reg Map” document detailing each step of the rulemaking process, is available on Reginfo.gov.
Related News
-
FMC Closing One of Two Investigations into Conditions Created by Canadian Ballast Water Regulations
The Federal Maritime Commission is closing one of its two investigations of how Canadian ballast water regulations impact shipping in the Great Lakes, but the remaining investigation will continue to permit the agency to assess…
-
FMC Issues Request for Additional Information Regarding Premier Alliance Agreement
A global operational alliance of three container shipping companies will not go into effect next week because more information is needed by the Federal Maritime Commission to determine the potential competitive impacts of the arrangement. …
-
FMC Examining Restrictive Port Practices of the Government of Spain
The Federal Maritime Commission (“Commission” or “FMC”) has initiated an investigation into regulations or practices by the Government of Spain which appear to bar certain vessels, including U.S.-flagged vessels, from calling at ports in that…
-
FMC October 2024 Activity Report
Statements & Releases FMC Meeting Addresses Enforcement, Charge Complaints & IT Modernization Commissioners were briefed at the October meeting of the Federal Maritime Commission about active investigations of significant regulated entities, successes in helping shippers…
-
FMC Seeks Public Comments on Premier Alliance Agreement
The Federal Maritime Commission has opened a 15-day comment period for members of the public to comment in response to a newly filed vessel sharing agreement between Ocean Network Express (ONE), Hyundai Merchant Marine (HMM),…
-
FMC September 2024 Activity Report
Statements & Releases Industry Advisory: All FMC Statutes and Regulations Remain in Full Effect in the Event of Terminal Closures Related to Possible Work Stoppage Regulated entities are reminded that all statutes and regulations administered…
-
FMC Meeting Addresses Enforcement, Charge Complaints & IT Modernization
Active investigations of significant regulated entities, successes in helping shippers resolve billing disputes, and how information technology upgrades will improve the ability to serve the public were all topics of discussion during the open session…
-
FMC Monitoring and Review of Surcharges and Fees
The Federal Maritime Commission is monitoring the supply chain closely at all major terminals along the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts. The FMC continues to review surcharges and fees announced, implemented, or suspended in connection…
-
Commission Meeting Scheduled for October 22, 2024
SUNSHINE ACT MEETING TIME AND DATE: October 22, 2024; 1:00 p.m. PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Surface Transportation Board at the address below and also streamed live on the Federal Maritime Commission’s…
Categories: Commission Meeting Agenda
-
Prohibition on Retaliation Against Shippers, Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, and Motor Carriers
The Federal Maritime Commission takes seriously and investigates thoroughly allegations of common carrier or marine terminal operator (MTO) retaliation against shippers or their agents, ocean transportation intermediaries, and motor carriers. On December 28, 2021, the…