About
On June 16, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden signed into law the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA), enacted as Public Law 117-146 [PDF, 219 KB]. This webpage catalogs Commission actions taken to comply with requirements established by the enacted legislation. It will be updated regularly.
OSRA Rulemaking Activity
Final Rule
Industry Advisories
- Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts
Posted: June 2, 2023 - Industry Advisory — Interim Procedures for Submitting “Charge Complaints” Under 46 U.S.C. § 41310
Posted: July 14, 2022 - Industry Advisory — Demurrage and Detention Billing Practices
Posted: July 22, 2022 - Industry Advisory — Applicability of Provisions Contained in PL 117-146
Posted: June 24, 2022
Charge Complaints
Reports
- Study on Best Practices of Chassis Pools (National Academies)
This report is published pursuant to section 19 of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. The report was produced by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. It is not a work product of the Federal Maritime Commission. - Fact Finding 29 Final Report
- Containerized Freight Statistics
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can I file a Charge Complaint within a Formal Proceeding under 46 CFR § 502.61 or Small Claims (formal or informal) Proceeding under 46 CFR § 502.301-321?
No. Charge Complaints are a separate process from Formal or Small Claims complaints.
Charge complaint filers can choose to separately submit a Formal or Small Claims complaint, or provide information to the Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement, Investigation, and Compliance in support of a Commission investigation, but these distinct processes cannot be combined into a single submission.
You can also seek alternative dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services.
More information on the Charge Complaint Process can be found in Guidance on Charge Complaint Interim Procedures.
If a demurrage and detention invoice/bill does not meet OSRA’s requirements, does that permanently eliminate responsibility to pay the charges on that non-conforming invoice?
No. Issuing an invoice/bill that does not comply with OSRA’s requirements does not permanently eliminate the invoice recipient’s (invoiced/billed party’s) obligation to pay those charges.
46 U.S.C. § 41104(f) cancels the obligation to pay an invoice/bill that does not conform to OSRA but does not prevent the carrier from reissuing the charges on an invoice/bill that does meet OSRA requirements. A charged party does have an obligation to pay charges billed via a compliant invoice.
Does OSRA have a phase-in period? Can the public wait for further Commission guidance or rulemakings before complying?
No. OSRA included no phase-in periods, with a few limited exceptions. OSRA requirements became effective when enacted on June 16, 2022. The Commission addressed this question in Industry Advisories posted here on June 24, 2022 and July 22, 2022 (See Industry Advisories Section above).
The Commission is engaged in several rulemakings necessary to implement OSRA. Pending or future rulemakings do not defer the obligation to comply with OSRA requirements that are already in effect.
Is the Commission planning to issue rulemakings regarding OSRA? Where can I look for guidance?
Rulemakings are underway to implement OSRA. Detailed instructions on how to submit comments, including instructions on how to request confidential treatment, who to contact for further information, and any additional information on the rulemaking process is described in the respective rulemaking documents when they are issued.
The Commission has transitioned to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at regulations.gov to provide a central location for public notice and opportunity for comment on its rulemaking proceedings.
Information on current rulemaking projects is posted on this page or can be viewed on the Commission’s reginfo.gov page.
Do invoices/bills issued to non-U.S. entities need to comply with OSRA’s invoice/billing requirements? What if they are issued by a non-U.S. entity?
Yes. The requirements are applicable to common carriers as defined at 46 U.S.C. § 40102(7). The Commission does not determine if a common carrier meets that definition based on if its customers are based in the U.S. Instead, the Commission makes its determination based on whether a common carrier holds itself out to provide transportation between the U.S. and a foreign country and uses, for all or part of the transportation, a vessel operating between a U.S. port and a foreign port.
If an entity is acting as a common carrier as defined under the Shipping Act, then the common carrier’s invoices/bills for charges to both U.S. and non-U.S. entities are subject to the law. The common carrier must also comply with the invoice/billing requirements of 46 U.S.C. § 41104(d) for demurrage and detention charges. This holds true regardless of whether the invoices/bills are issued in the United States or abroad, whether they are issued to a U.S. entity or a foreign entity, and whether they are issued by a U.S. common carrier or non-U.S. common carrier.
Where can I learn more about the rulemaking process?
An abbreviated explanation of the rulemaking process can be found on Regulations.gov. A more expansive reference, that includes Frequently Asked Questions and a “Reg Map” document detailing each step of the rulemaking process, is available on Reginfo.gov.
Related News
-
Compromise Agreements Yield over $2.3 Million in Penalties & Changes to Business Practices
The Federal Maritime Commission has entered into compromise agreements with three different companies resulting in the collection of more than $2.3 million in civil penalty payments, and commitments by each company to reform specific business…
Categories: News Articles
-
American Queen Voyages — Update on Refund Process
SURETY BOND PROCESSES Passengers who had booked travel aboard an American Queen Voyages (AQV) vessel departing from a United States port may file a refund claim against the surety bond. The now-insolvent company was required…
Categories: News Articles
-
FMC Launches Investigation of the Impact of Canadian Regulations on U.S.-Flag Carriers
The Federal Maritime Commission launched an investigation today to determine if pending Canadian regulations governing ballast water management systems of ships in the U.S.-Canada Great Lakes trade have a disparate effect on U.S. flagged vessels and constitute…
Categories: News Articles
-
Commission Meeting Scheduled for May 29, 2024
SUNSHINE ACT MEETING TIME AND DATE: May 29, 2024; 1:00 p.m. PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Surface Transportation Board at the address below and also streamed live on the Federal Maritime Commission’s YouTube channel. Surface Transportation Board395 E.…
-
Final Rule on Demurrage & Detention Cleared to Take Full Effect May 28
Recent actions taken by the Office of the Management and Budget (OMB) and the Federal Maritime Commission clear the way for the final rule on Demurrage and Detention Billing Practices to take full effect on…
Categories: News Articles
-
Testimony of Chairman Maffei before Congress: Review of Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request for the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Programs
Statement of Daniel B. Maffei Chairman Federal Maritime Commission On “Review of Fiscal Year 2025 Maritime Transportation Budget Requests, Pt. 1: Maritime Administration and Federal Maritime Commission” Before the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime…
-
March 2024 Activity Report
STATEMENTS & RELEASES FMC FY25 Congressional Budget Justification Released The Federal Maritime Commission has released its Fiscal Year 2025 Congressional Budget Justification. The document is available on the “Congressional Budget Reports” webpage. Mohammad “Ali” Usman…
Categories: News Articles
-
March 2024 Activity Report
STATEMENTS & RELEASES FMC FY25 Congressional Budget Justification Released The Federal Maritime Commission has released its Fiscal Year 2025 Congressional Budget Justification. The document is available on the “Congressional Budget Reports” webpage. Mohammad “Ali” Usman…
Categories: Activity Report
-
Industry Advisory—All FMC Statutes & Regulations Remain in Full Effect Following Bridge Collapse
Disruption to regular service at the Port of Baltimore is causing many shippers to adjust supply chain operations. Regulated entities are reminded that all statutes administered by the Federal Maritime Commission remain in effect. Common…
-
Industry Advisory—All FMC Statutes & Regulations Remain in Full Effect Following Bridge Collapse
Disruption to regular service at the Port of Baltimore is causing many shippers to adjust supply chain operations. Regulated entities are reminded that all statutes administered by the Federal Maritime Commission remain in effect. Common…
Categories: News Articles